Mia Khalifa isn’t one to stay silent. When news broke that OpenAI had quietly inked a two‑year, $200 million contract with the U.S. Department of Defense to adapt ChatGPT and other AI tools for military and administrative uses, Khalifa took to Twitter with a savage one‑liner:
Her punchy jab distilled broader unease over consumer AI being repurposed for warfare. OpenAI’s rapid ascent—now generating billions in revenue and drawing half a billion weekly users—has positioned the company at the center of an ethical firestorm. Critics worry that once a technology meant for chat and creativity crosses into defense, lines blur on issues like accountability, civilian safety, and the future of autonomous weapons.
Despite its vow that “no models will be used for direct lethal action,” OpenAI’s decision to lift its own ban on military applications earlier this year has left many questioning where the guardrails lie. From international talks on “killer robots” to NGOs warning against unregulated battlefield AI, the debate is heating up—and Khalifa’s viral critique proves that public figures can amplify what might otherwise be a closed‑door policy discussion.
As AI increasingly shapes everything from your morning routine to national security, Khalifa’s tweet is more than a snarky aside—it’s a spotlight on the uneasy alliance between Silicon Valley innovation and military ambition.
Discover more from HIGHMOORE
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.